Hey, great read as always. It's sobering to realy see the pace of AI-powered threats so clearly laid out. Given this rapid shift, do you think a fundamental re-architecture of our digital security is inevitable, or can we still incrementally adapt existing frameworks? Your insights on the defense deficit are particularly sharp.
Thanks, Rainbow. Appreciate the kind words. Incremental works if you're willing to throw out sacred cows and admit your current stack is obsolete in specific areas. The prompt injection research proves that same-origin policies mean nothing when your AI assistant executes commands from untrusted webpages with your credentials, so you either ban agentic browsers entirely or accept data theft as a cost of doing business. The real question isn't architecture versus adaptation but whether your C-Suite and board will fund the speed and scope needed to close your capability gaps so you aren't one of the 76%, and before you're the cautionary tale in someone else's newsletter.
Hey, great read as always. It's sobering to realy see the pace of AI-powered threats so clearly laid out. Given this rapid shift, do you think a fundamental re-architecture of our digital security is inevitable, or can we still incrementally adapt existing frameworks? Your insights on the defense deficit are particularly sharp.
Thanks, Rainbow. Appreciate the kind words. Incremental works if you're willing to throw out sacred cows and admit your current stack is obsolete in specific areas. The prompt injection research proves that same-origin policies mean nothing when your AI assistant executes commands from untrusted webpages with your credentials, so you either ban agentic browsers entirely or accept data theft as a cost of doing business. The real question isn't architecture versus adaptation but whether your C-Suite and board will fund the speed and scope needed to close your capability gaps so you aren't one of the 76%, and before you're the cautionary tale in someone else's newsletter.